I’m putting together a literature-review article intended primarily for students and other academic readers who need a clear yet rigorous overview of the current scholarship on a selected topic. The piece must move beyond a simple summary: I need a critical synthesis that traces key themes, pinpoints methodological strengths and weaknesses, and highlights gaps that future research might address. Here’s how I’d like to tackle the work. First, you’ll survey recent peer-reviewed journals, books, and reputable conference proceedings, selecting only sources that meaningfully expand the conversation. Once an agreed-upon reading list is in place, you’ll craft a structured outline so I can confirm the logical flow before full drafting begins. The finished manuscript should read like a publishable review article—thoroughly referenced (APA or MLA is fine), written in precise academic English, and roughly 3,000 words, although we can fine-tune length as needed. I value clarity, coherence, and originality, so please avoid jargon where simpler wording works and weave in your own critical perspective rather than stringing summaries together. If you already use tools such as Zotero or Mendeley for citation management and Grammarly or similar software for polishing prose, feel free to mention it; solid workflow matters to me. Let’s set milestones for the outline, a partial draft, and the final submission so feedback is handled smoothly and revisions are minimal. If you’re comfortable synthesising literature for an academic audience and can deliver a polished, insightful review, I look forward to working together.