I need a concise, 1,000-word philosophy essay completed as soon as possible. The paper must center on ethics and morality, using Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative and John Stuart Mill’s utilitarian principle as the main lenses of analysis. Please weave the two frameworks together—compare, contrast, and critically evaluate how each addresses moral decision-making—then arrive at a reasoned conclusion on which approach offers the stronger guide for action in the scenario of your choosing. Academic tone is essential: clear thesis in the introduction, logically ordered arguments, smooth transitions, and a brief but meaningful conclusion. Cite primary texts (Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Utilitarianism) or reputable secondary sources in whichever citation style you are most comfortable with; just keep it consistent. Deliverable: • A polished 1,000-word essay in an editable format (DOCX or Google Doc) with in-text citations and a reference list. I will review for coherence, depth of analysis, and proper citation before releasing final approval, so please plan for one quick revision if needed. Speed matters, but substance is key—let me know your timeline and any clarifying questions right away.