I have a published Wikipedia article that’s drifting away from the platform’s Neutral Point of View. A disgruntled employee or customer has introduced negative slants, so the page now feels more like a complaint board than an encyclopedic entry. I need the article brought back in line with Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and objectivity. Your mission is to comb through the current text, identify language that betrays bias, and rework or remove it so every statement is balanced, verifiable, and written in an even tone. Where a claim truly belongs, back it with reliable secondary sources that satisfy Wikipedia’s verifiability rules. When you’re done, the article should read as a fair, well-sourced overview rather than a one-sided critique. Deliverables • Collaboration for a clean, neutral rewrite followed by presenting in live form • An edit summary (or diff report) explaining each substantive change for easy review • A list of any new sources added so I can keep track of them I’ll supply the page link and any relevant background materials as soon as we start. Please share links to previous Wikipedia edits or pages you’ve improved so I can gauge your familiarity with the platform’s policies.